(3) Missionaries of Mercy: “New Phase” from the Holy See (Amoris laetitia internal/external forum guidelines?)

Missionaries of Mercy reconfirmation

In the letter from Archbishop Rino Fisichella over at New Evangelization (Prot. N. NE/532/2017/P) confirming some Missionaries of Mercy for continued service we read about the Missionaries of Mercy receiving this excellent monitum (emphasis is in the letter itself):

“I would like to remind you that the Ministry of the Missionary of Mercy is limited exclusively to the internal forum. Thus a Missionary is not competent to enter into questions or measures which are the competence of the external forum.

This is a stand alone paragraph in the letter. There is no other context or references given. I have to wonder if this implies a partial answer to the dubia of some Cardinals presented to Pope Francis regarding the interpretation of various difficult passages and notes in Amoris laetitia.

If anyone had the idea that any notes of anything such as in Chapter 8 of Amoris laetitia indicate that it is possible in the internal forum (Confession) to permit a notorious and unrepentant grave sinner go to Holy Communion – whether that impression about anything in Chapter 8 is correct or incorrect – they should note that such is now no longer the case, if it ever was.

Of anyone, a Missionary of Mercy is encouraged, it seems, to permit that which the Church has never permitted, but not only is this not the case, but here we see that the Missionary of Mercy (and therefore all priests) are forbidden to extend the effect of the internal forum to the external forum, providing infamous “internal forum solutions” (condemned many dozens of times by the CDF upon inquiries over the past decades).

Also see:

5 Comments

Filed under Amoris laetitia, Missionaries of Mercy

5 responses to “(3) Missionaries of Mercy: “New Phase” from the Holy See (Amoris laetitia internal/external forum guidelines?)

  1. James Anderson

    Maybe this is why some Missionaries of Mercy were not reconfirmed.

  2. Father George David Byers

    Could be..

  3. elizdelphi

    Maybe I don’t understand, but doesn’t this seem like something obvious? Were some Missionaries of Mercy overstepping their authority?

    Is the point that the Missionary of Mercy cannot grant an external forum legitimacy to irregular marriage situations?

  4. Father George David Byers

    Some maybe were just too busy with other things, got sick, died….

  5. Father George David Byers

    Also that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s