Tradition’s parrhesia
Sacred Scripture - Sacred Tradition - The Magisterium - The Natural Law - Unity with the Bishop of Rome
-
-
Recent Comments
Joisy Goil on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Carroll Keen on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) sanfelipe007 on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) pelerin on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Father George David… on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Tom Schott on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Dianna on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Claire Dion on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) jane a brown on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) meshugunah on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Lara Traylor on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) James Anderson on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Lioba on Laudie-dog (2010-2022) Judith Stefencavage on Two Hearts Rosary: Cana and Ca… Madgalene on Blah Blah Synod™ emails:…
ARISE! LET US BE GOING! 
This was wrongly worded:
“Kennedy contended that it was a vaccine that caused this child’s condition which was then addressed with ritalin.”
It should be “Kennedy contended that it was a vaccine that caused, the very condition in a child that was then addressed with ritalin.”
Thanks for the video, Father. Kennedy made a statement about the a general difference between vaccinated children and unvaccinated children that struck a chord with me in that it described what I have witness among children in general; what I always shrtugged of as a symptom of public education, was also prevalent in private Catholic schools. I personally knew children in one parochial school that had been placed on ritalin, walkin around like zombies, where before taking that med, had been bright eyed and full of life, although a little hyper. It broke my heart to see such a young child changed overnight just to make a child more compliant.
Kennedy contended that it was a vaccine that caused this child’s condition which was then addressed with ritalin. So that was his connection. Heartbreaking.
I want to see a giant study comparing the health of all children between the group that were vaccinated and unvaccinated. It might never be conducted, but I would like to see who opposes the undertaking.