With the White House basically encouraging terrorism, you know, saying things like we aren’t actually, like, actually encouraging terrorism but surely we, like, encourage mostly peaceful protests, like, for sure… don’t be expecting the DOJ or DHS to circle back and investigate domestic terrorism and hate crimes.
They notice it, but they turn a blind eye. I don’t know, but I recall, say, the FBI baiting idiots into some act of terrorism so as to see who’s connected with them, but with the intention of stopping them before they actually see any plot put into action, but then fail at stopping the terrorist act, say, a mass shooting. Then, the very second it hits the news it’s all politicized so that it’s all the fault of the 2nd amendment and we need to get rid of the filibuster. So, plenty of false-flag operations. In this case, no one is saying that we have to have Molotov-cocktail control legislation[!] but we just hear more circling back to a kind of encouragement of terrorism from the White House: we’re not exactly encouraging terrorism but, like, you know, we’re surely encouraging, like, mostly peaceful protests; we’re not exactly encouraging the assassination of Supreme Court Justices, but, like, we’re just encouraging mostly peaceful protests at the family homes of those Justices, happy with the doxing of addresses so as to terrorize the families, because it’s all about the children…
The meme these days regarding those (witch)crafting the perspective, as they say, is that they are not self-aware, as if they don’t realize that everything they say is a lie, the exact opposite of the truth, so that the irony couldn’t be more incisive. But I don’t think they are so stupid. And they don’t think that anyone thinks their lies are lies, but that they get support from people who recognize the lies as open mockery of the truth. They don’t embrace the lie. They aren’t woke into some fog of lies. No. They create the mockery of the truth with their lies. They work at it. Meanwhile, people die. It’s adrenaline having them live for power cut off from justice, cut off from service, the purposed murder of the innocent in the womb, almost all of whom are little black babies, because it’s all about the genocide of black people by way of attrition. The deep state is entirely racist, genocidal. They’ll stop at nothing. The destruction of America is no worry to them. Their only concern is the feelings of power they have to kill.
3 responses to “Molotov cocktail thrown into pro-life office”
The demon’s willing minions.
That is in my town. I know this organization and have met the woman whose office that is, she’s a good evangelical Christian lady. There’s now been a claim of responsibility, who knows if that is factual https://www.channel3000.com/nationwide-group-claiming-to-be-behind-wisconsin-family-action-firebombing-issues-warning/
I have been mulling over the “First Communiqué” issued by “Jane’s Revenge” which claims the following: “This is not a declaration of war. War has been upon us for decades. A war which we did not want, and did not provoke. Too long have we been attacked for asking for basic medical care. Too long have we been shot, bombed, and forced into childbirth without consent. … We are literally fighting for our lives. We will not sit still while we are killed and forced into servitude. … And we will not stop, we will not back down, nor will we hesitate to strike until the inalienable right to manage our own health is returned to us. We are not one group, but many. We are in your city. We are in every city. Your repression only strengthens our accomplice-ship and resolve” (at link provided by Elizdelphi above).
The lies in that communiqué are obvious in their absurdity and yet spewed forth as “righteous rage” for an injustice that does not exist – the “injustice” of not everyone congratulating “Jane” on her abortion, agreeing that murdering her unborn child is a woman’s right and giving her her due as a brave, out and proud defender of that “right”.
Reading Jane’s hate-filled rant brought the hate-filled rant of another to mind. No-one here would know him and I haven’t seen him for several years, but I knew him as a child and teen, and we were in touch at least by phone until just before last Christmas when he abruptly ended the call while I was responding to his claim that I was defending the indefensible. I only mention this because he sounded very much like Jane, his chosen path in life driving him to rage and paranoia. Whereas Jane claimed that people (some? / all?) not in solidarity with the pro-choice community were out to kill her and others like herself, this young man claimed people (some? / all?) not in solidarity with the LGBTQI community were out to kill him and others like himself. He was delusional or at least his accusations were but deep down he had to know he was lying. He is not insane but since adopting the “gay” lifestyle after leaving home for university has suffered with anxiety and depression for which he is receiving medication but to no avail, his anxiety and depression growing worse as he goes further down the rabbit-hole now believing himself “non-binary” as well as homosexual. This young man used to be a practising Catholic but now hates the Church and delights in abusing his mother (only verbally at present as they fortunately live hundreds of kilometres apart in different states) for raising him Catholic, an action which in his upside-down thinking constitutes child abuse and requires punishment.
I was recently informed that LGBTQI is now LGBTQIA, the “A” standing for “allies”; and Jane mentions “accomplice-ship”, another “A”. These two terms are used by so called social justice advocates and understood as follows:
“An ally will mostly engage in activism by standing with an individual or group in a marginalized community [e.g. The LGBTQI community; the BLM community; and apparently the Pro-Choice community as they, too, claim marginalisation]. An accomplice will focus more on dismantling the structures that oppress that individual or group —and such work will be directed by the stakeholders in the marginalized group.” [like Jane of “Jane’s Revenge” and Ruth of “Ruth Sent Us?]
Jane also boasts: “We are not one group, but many.” That’s concerning! Together, ally-ship and accomplice-ship are creating a many-headed monster it seems, each head a different grievance group (re race, sexual orientation and gender identity, reproduction etc) intending to destabilise and overturn society in order to remake it according to their dictates (reset and makeover … WEF’s “Great Reset” comes to mind). What makes the matter more worrying is that such attitudes and behaviours are set to grow now that they are being taught at school and university as moral imperatives. By way of example, in addition to the link above, see “Activating Accomplice-ship at Columbia” at link below.
Curiously, that event at Columbia University (“Activating Accomplice-ship … Deconstructing Whiteness”) was under the auspices of Columbia Health and Jane of Jane’s Revenge claimed killing the unborn as basic medical care; even the WEF relied on a lack of health – a health crisis / pandemic – to push its Great Reset at the 2020 Davos meeting where it claimed “an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis (and therefore to) improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative”.
Is it being suggested that our health is an inalienable right and under assault as Jane claims, and only a complete overthrow or cultural / socio-economic reset can make every thing right? Does ‘reset” in the above context mean “to cancel” and begin again – to abort life as we know it and start over? If so, the powers behind such a grand scheme are demonic and reaching for what they have always desired: the annihilation of mankind.
Perhaps I am overthinking this.