Of all places, California is laudably proposing legislation that would criminalize AI-generated deepfake porn that is shared without consent. The idea is that you get any, say, yearbook picture or something more contemporary and have AI create some deepfake porn with that image. That’s used for sleazy entertainment. That could be used against politicians, bad or good, right? What could go wrong?
WordPress has an editing gadget for inserting AI generated paragraphs. I tried to get it to say something on the paragraph above but my request was denied because of the vocabulary, surely the word “porn”.
Is that AI simply flagging words like “porn” or is that AI refusing to be criticized? It’s interesting that AI has no problem creating porn, but does have a problem getting criticized about it.
I’m guessing this post like all the rest of the posts on this blog will be just about 100% shadow banned, which is another AI flex.
The contemporary “culture” has become a very bad science fiction movie. It is high time the Good Lord takes back all His prerogatives!
Yes indeed, “a very bad science fiction movie’.
Is “Artificial Intelligence” technology’s rush into communication with demons? Seances and ouija boards certainly seem old hat now when an incorporeal being of some sort can take over one’s life, “creating” content that can destroy reputations and souls.
That’s an striking question, Mum. Another might be “is it a violation of ‘Thou shalt not make any graven image’?” AI could be seen as a way for man to pretend to be able to replace the Creator with himself by making a “man” in his own image.
It’s all in what one* intends to do with it.
But now I think of the tech used to divine the Lord’s will when lots were cast to decide what must be done with Jonah. I think you are very close to the mark, Mum, because decisions are left to a construct, which ostensibly renders the user free from responsibility. Wasn’t “passing the buck” practiced in defense of original sin?
* how’s that for a preferred pronoun?