Now we see that they did have some serious rifles and a ballistic shield, and, within a few more minutes, a total of three ballistic shields early on.
Now we hear that the security door of the classroom was unlocked the entire time. No one had even tried to turn the handle. They still speak of “breaching” the door. B.S. Just open it normally.
This is messed up.
If those who were in that corridor are not being fulsome about what happened, still, after all the traumatic funerals…
This is messed up.
And it’s now coming out that woke ideology was rampant in the school, like, that’s what they did. If that involves the hyper-sexualization of kids since infancy, and then immediately gender-bending bullying, and then Critical Race Theory, of course that goes a long way to creating mass shooters with no identity.
That reminds me of the church security program the bishops are pushing. Welcome to CRT with force. I’ll get to that in another post.
Legit or illegit in the law, Jared Yanis asks the liability question: if the police higher-ups give the impression that they are in charge and that they are busy with effecting a rescue, but then, contrary to this, provide a standdown order to subordinate LEOs even while stopping others (like the parents of the kids who are getting slaughtered) from doing the necessary, are at least the police higher-ups liable in some way?
Meanwhile, I’m no lawyer, not a cop. But I do have some observations of my own.
(1) The breachability of the door: even if you have no breaching explosives or other tools, let’s take the worst case scenario, a steel security door meant to stop fires and bullets. Rated 1-10, availability, say, for schools, such doors are typically limited from ratings 1-8. But even level 10 is not considered bullet proof, but rather bullet resistant. This means that a good fist full of shots from a rifle carried by some LEOs in the trunks of their cruisers (say, something throwing out a 7.62 or even a 5.56), or simply a solid fist-full of bullets from pistols carried by all LEOs, all these doors will fail, guaranteed. If there are no windows and you don’t know where victims are at, you throw yourself to the floor in the corridor opposite the door though not directly in front of it, and angle a heap of bullets upward around any locking mechanisms and the frame of the door. What I mean is, you let the bullets fly, well placed, but quite continuously. With that, just a bit of brute force will make such a door fly open. Anyone familiar with guns and who practices scenarios knows this. Is there something absolutely impossibly unique about this door at this school, on paper? Still, you never know in real-world circumstances if that’s fact, until you try. But you try.
(2) There is no such thing as an active shooter with large numbers of people involved that turns into a hostage situation. That’s a very outdated way of thinking with inapplicable circumstances of hijackings and bank robberies where aggressors wanted to stay alive. Regardless of knowing about ongoing 911 calls from the kids, regardless of 911 calls taking place or not, you must assume that there are kids who, even if shot, are still alive and in need of urgent medical assistance. Are there still sporadic shots after a barrage of slaughter, you know, with those shots targeting LEOs. Surely. Whether or not it could ever be proved to be the case, in the fog of war you have to assume that at least some of those shots are aimed at helpless kids who caught breathing, hearts beating.
Here’s the point: The kids have no guns. They have no ballistic vests. There simply is no excuse for not going in as soon as physically possible. None.
I agree with Jared. There is a question of liability.
But just say that no matter what there is liability and no matter what you’ll be guilty. Who cares? When it comes to doing the rescue or not, you just do the rescue, come what may. You gotta.
I’ve been shot at – really a lot – in my life. More recently, I’ve been a police chaplain under very many regimes and have been in a thousand situations, some of them very immediately dangerous, some involving SWAT-esque no-knock entries, some involving traffic stops going wrong, some domestics, some involving the clearing of a school with a reported “guy with a gun” after school hours with not one person involved hesitating even a nano-second, as you don’t know if a “guy with a gun” in the school has kids with him who he’s turned on, and you don’t know around which of the 100,000 corners you’ll find a gun in your face. You just do it. Someone could need life saving attention immediately.
This isn’t about the LEOs’ safety.
This is about the safety of victims who may still be alive.
“Ho il cuore affranto per la strage nella scuola elementare in Texas. Prego per i bambini, per gli adulti uccisi e per le loro famiglie. È tempo di dire basta al traffico indiscriminato delle armi. Impegniamoci tutti, perché tragedie così non possano più accadere.”
My own loose translation:
“My heart is in mourning on account of the massacre at the elementary school in Texas. I pray for the children, the adults killed and for their families. It is time to say enough to the indiscriminate trafficking of arms. Let us all work so that tragedies like this can no longer take place.”
“It is time to say enough…” So, when was there ever a time when indiscriminate trafficking of arms was acceptable? Never. Where was there ever a place in which indiscriminate trafficking of arms was acceptable? Nowhere. So, this is yet another straw man to attack, flailingly, so that one’s “doing something” is a waste of time and an insult to those innocents who continue to lose their lives.
“But Father George! Father George! Give the Pope a break! Everyone says stuff like that! He’s just trying to show concern!”
No. Kids are dying and are dead because of rubbish like this. And it’s not everyone saying stuff like that. It’s only the marxist MSM. Anyone think I’m wrong about Pope Francis on weapons?
Back in 2014, Pope Francis had some comments about anyone who has anything to do with even the manufacturing of guns, condemning all of them individually and indiscriminately:
“I am thinking of those who manufacture weapons for fomenting wars; just think about what kind of job this is. I am certain that if I were to ask: how many of you manufacture weapons? No one, no one. These weapons manufacturers don’t come to hear the Word of God! These people manufacture death, they are merchants of death and they make death into a piece of merchandise. May fear of the Lord make them understand that one day all things will come to an end and they will have to give account to God.”
Seriously? I’m guessing that there are plenty of upstanding, religious people who work on production lines at, say, Benelli, Beretta, Browning, Glock, Heckler & Koch, Remington, Ruger, SIG Sauer, Taurus, Walther, Winchester and dozens of others. They all surely go through background checks continuously. Are they really to be condemned to hell for eternity?
With Pope Francis, there’s clearly no right to defend one’s country against violent unjust aggression by joining the military which uses guns, or to defend kids in an elementary school as an SRO by training up with appropriate tools such as guns, or to participate in law enforcement to serve and protect citizens in good standing over against deadly aggression also by usage of guns, or to come to the aid of one’s neighbors or oneself when deadly aggression comes to the doorsteps of the neighborhood, also by usage of guns. For Pope Francis, the very fact of the existence of weapons is bad and evil, so that, a fortiori, worse than the manufacturing of weapons is the use of weapons. Any use.
So, what’s really going on? Does Pope Francis allow weapons in Vatican City for his own protection? And you’ll recognize the names of the manufacturers as well:
The Swiss Guard carry a SIG Sauer P220 pistol and the SIG SG 550 rifle or its SG 552 variant.
Vatican City’s Gendarmerie carries various types of Glocks as standard-issue. They also use the Beretta M12 and the Heckler & Koch MP5 sub-machine gun.
Let’s take look at a few of the tools of the Swiss Guard:
Then the tools of the Gendarmerie (I myself use the G-19 gen 4 as EDC):
There are plenty of plain-clothes guys:
And also special response teams:
Meanwhile, Tucker asks what’s going on with mostly young men who go on rampages. He makes lots of good points, but asks for a real discussion.
Meanwhile, Ben Shapiro notes the obvious as only he can:
Gun control was the discussion in Texas but it can’t be the discussion in New York because New York already has very heavy gun control. So instead, the discussion was about white supremacy. If it’s a New York subway shooting where it isn’t about gun control or white supremacy, the incident is simply ignored. If it’s a shooting at a religious building in California it’s a hate crime but it’s not about gun control as there’s already more than a lot of gun control, so that’s also ignored.
Might I venture a guess as to what’s happening?
Increasing violence of young men isn’t at all predetermined by the lack of a good father figure in the home. No. But, statistically, we see that to a very large degree a couple of good parents is beneficial. If they are not worth a father sticking around to help raise them they can quickly get the idea that no one’s life matters.
What doesn’t help are liberal school policies that push hatred of God, neighbor and hatred of self with Critical Race Theory. Students can quickly get the idea that no one’s life matters at that point.
What doesn’t help are liberal school policies that super-hyper-sexualize children from pre-pre-school, instructing them about sex-acts, stripping them of any kind of individual identity, grooming them into thinking that their bodies are mere pieces of meat for the utilitarian usage of the state and others and self. Students can quickly figure out that no one’s life matters at that point.
What doesn’t help is atheist teachers smacking down any prayer, any relationship with God, and therefore smacking down any rejoicing that the image of God in which students have a vocation to participate is described, as Genesis says, with male/female/marriage/family. When the image of God, who we are before God and each other is trashed, then students can quickly figure out that no one’s life actually matters.
Here’s the deal: if you rip away all possibility of identity from individuals, they will lash out in overwhelming cynicism that asks the question: “Are all y’all so sure that no one’s life matters; how about yours?” And then they force an answer, “Oh, it’s a tragedy.” But apparently that answer is a lie, because no one goes to the heart of what’s happening. They stick with the same ol’ same ol’: “Blame inanimate objects but we’re going to destroy children’s identities all the same!” Sigh. Instead, we need our religious leaders to bring us to the truth, and not fall back on liberal talking points that keep getting kids murdered. So:
Let’s stop attacking Jesus, attacking doctrine, attacking morality, attacking liturgy and attacking the spiritual life. Let’s stop demonic idol worship. Let’s stop attacking the Way, the Truth and the Life.
Let’s start again to talk about and worship our Lord and God, Christ Jesus. Let’s get back correct doctrine, correct morality, correct liturgy and correct spiritual life that all brings identity in Christ Jesus, that all brings back joy in the Holy Spirit in a life lived well before self, before neighbor and before God. Anything else brings dead children in its wake.
I’m guessing that, after SCOTUS publishes their decision on kicking abortion law back to the States, there will be another “Summer of Love” here in the USA, this time not with attacks on Federal and local law enforcement, with a CHAZ here or a CHOP there, but inside any church during whatever services, all wrought by those who have been taught to kill children in the womb or just born. There are plenty of Catholic schools which do field trips to abortion clinics to teach girls where to go if, you know, they put their sex-ed into practice. But then the “official line” of the Church is no abortion. Kids will lash out. I can’t think of anyone who would hate herself more than a woman who just had an abortion. Statistically the day a woman has an abortion is the day more than any other that she will at least attempt suicide. All of it so very sad.
People have a right to have witnessed to them what Jesus did for us in laying down His life for us, the Innocent for the guilty, so that He has the right in His own justice to have mercy on us, to bring us to heaven. But who talks about Jesus anymore? So many priests and bishops and Cardinals – and the Pope – promote LGBTQI+. The last thing they want to do is talk about Jesus, talk about our identity in Jesus.
If people do not have Jesus witnessed to them, they have a right before the throne of God to take the witness. That means martyrdom. People lashing out won’t go to Styrofoam cowardly people. They will go to real people. Good laity, any good priests, any good bishops, innocent children, and take witness from them. There are heroic teachers and heroic little students who I’m sure tried to help each other, protect each other. The loss of their lives bids us to do what is right in bringing back true identity to individuals.
Where is God in all of this? He’s the one being executed for bringing us back the possibility of our true identities. Get that? God gave His all for us in the midst of all the hell of this world so as to provide us, if we want it in His grace, our true identities in which we can rejoice before God, neighbor and ourselves. That’s what’s going to reverse the sharp increase in violence among disenfranchised young men. People keeping up with prayer and the commandments and regular Confession are relatively speaking extremely less likely to go on rampages like this.
Oh, and just to say, might it not be a good idea to go ahead and harden the soft targets, like elementary schools and churches, maybe not to the extent of Vatican City State, but you know what I mean. :-) Training of teams includes situational awareness, de-escalation techniques, etc.