Teaching Pope Francis about Papal Infallibility: Matthew 16:19 and Matthew 18:18

I first put this up 5 1/2 years ago. But now it’s necessary again. From vatican.va presser: ///

On Thursday 13 June 2024, at 11.30, a press conference will be held in the Holy See Press Office, Sala San Pio X, Via dell’Ospedale 1, to present the document of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, “The bishop of Rome. Primacy and synodality in the ecumenical dialogues and in the responses to the Encyclical Ut unum sint”.

“The Bishop of Rome” is a study document, published with the approval of Pope Francis, summarizing for the first time the responses to the Encyclical Ut unum sint and the ecumenical dialogues on the question of primacy and synodality. The document concludes with a proposal from the Dicastery, identifying the most significant suggestions made for a renewed exercise of the ministry of unity of the Bishop of Rome, “recognized by one and all”.

The speakers will be:

• His Eminence Cardinal Kurt Koch, prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity;
• His Eminence Cardinal Mario Grech, secretary general of the General Secretariat of the Synod;
• His Eminence Khajag Barsamian, representative of the Armenian Apostolic Church to the Holy See – Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin (by live link);
• His Grace Archbishop Ian Ernest, director of the Anglican Centre of Rome and personal representative of the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Holy See (by live link).

The press conference will be livestreamed in the original language on the Vatican News YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/VaticanNews.

---

Pope Francis has been convinced for decades that we’re all infallible. Well, well, well…

Jesus is uncharacteristically aggressive, as is the Holy Spirit, in Matthew 16:19 and Matthew 18:18, at least in our perception, for we are so weak and frightened, at least I am. But the more I know that, the more I love how Jesus and the Holy Spirit deal with our otherwise unredeemable and unsavable circumstances in this world.

Let me be be academically aggressive in my commentary. Perhaps Catholics with a self-referential ax to grind, perhaps some of our Orthodox friends and non-Catholic Christians with emotions to defend, Perhaps Pope Francis with disappointment with the Sacred Scriptures will be offended. That result of being offended is not necessarily a bad thing. It can make people think.

For those who have read some of this before in these pages, know that I have added an extra bit of incisive aggressiveness for your benefit. Let’s be pedantic about it:

• Matthew 16:19 — “Whatever you may bind at any given time (second person singular subjunctive aorist active) upon the earth will (third person singular indicative future middle) already have been made to be perfectly standing in that way (nominative neuter singular participle perfect passive) in the heavens.”

What do the verbs mean in this context?

Second person singular subjunctive aorist active –

• The second person singular refers to Peter alone, not to all, not even the other Apostles: Peter alone.
• The subjunctive here is not so much a kind of conditional or wishfulness, but rather depicts the state of actually choosing an option; from the perspective of the actor, there is freedom to the choice: “Whatever you may bind at any give time.”
• The aorist time frame, whatever delusion your introductory Greek grammars insist on providing to you, is literally “without borders”, that which can happen in the past, present or even future (as is the case here: see below).
• Active simply refers to something actually being accomplished.

Third person singular indicative future middle –

• The third person singular refers to any given object of the action, its state of being.
• It will simply be what it is (indicative)
• at that time (future).
• The middle voice is here used to indicate the status quo to which the actor is also subject, that is, retroactively to his decision to bind something, the truth of that which is described by the following verb, which this singular indicative future middle (“will”) helps to describe.

Nominative neuter singular participle perfect passive —

• The nominative neuter singular refers to the object which is being bound (passive)
• that is, in an ongoing fashion (participle)
• in a perfect manner (perfect); mind you, in Greek, “perfect” never refers to a perfectly accomplished action at one point in time, but rather to an action which is perfectly ongoing in a perfect manner since its inception: it always was and will be this way, perfectly, with no change: “already have been made to be perfectly standing in that way.” This “perfect” action structures the capacity of the actor, Peter, to act subjunctively, preempting all choices of Peter except for the one which is consonant which the truth which has always been this way in the heavens. Whatever he may choose to bind at any given time will already have been the case, is the case, and will always continue to be the case in the heavens. Peter cannot choose anything which is not already perfectly established in the heavens. What is in heaven is not an affirmation of what Peter might pronounce; what is in heaven simply is what it is, absolute truth, so to speak. If Peter is wrong about what he intends to pronounce upon, he simply will not be able to pronounce upon it.

Indeed, the part of this equation that people forget when trying to figure out the tenses, is that there is a part of this equation which is utterly expendable: Peter. If he is going to get it wrong, he will either die or be incapacitated, but he will not be able to work against what is in heaven already. Being the Successor of Peter isn’t so much an honor as it is a service that may involve laying down his life, for, after all, what do we know? The Orthodox or any others should never be envious of infallibility. It’s dangerous. It’s a service.

The bit about loosing is exactly the same, verbatim:

• “Whatever you may loose at any given time (second person singular subjunctive aorist active) upon the earth will (third person singular indicative future middle) already have been made to be perfectly standing in that way (nominative neuter singular participle perfect passive) in the heavens.”

Let’s review Matthew 18:18 in utterly pedantic translation:

• “Whatever ye may bind at any given time (second person plural subjunctive aorist active) upon the earth will (third person singular indicative future middle) already have been made to be things perfectly standing in that way (nominative neuter singular participle perfect passive) in heaven.”

And then:

• “Whatever ye may loose at any given time (second person plural subjunctive aorist active) upon the earth will (third person singular indicative future middle) already have been made to be things perfectly standing in that way (nominative neuter singular participle perfect passive) in heaven.”

There are some differences besides the plural heavens and singular heaven. Matthew 18:18 is addressed also to the laity about any number of things that may be under dispute. But the verbs and their meanings are exactly the same. But the context removes any infallibility from this other crowd. Let’s see how:

Firstly, in Matthew 16:19, where Peter alone among the Apostles is addressed, only Peter is given the keys of the Kingdom of the Heavens. There is no reference at all to such keys for anyone else in Matthew 18:18. That they have the same access to the understanding of the faith as does Peter is contingent for them in agreeing with Peter, for, as we see in context, the process of a dispute will bring them right back to the Church, that is, as differentiated from Christ’s faithful in general so as to refer to Peter in particular. They are not infallible, he is. If they rebel they are ipso facto no longer Catholic. This is what people also forget in this equation, that we are also expendable if we so choose.

What if Peter is wrong? He can’t be wrong when he speaks infallibly, ex-cathedra. That’s the point. The conditions, which must all be met, have never been fulfilled by Pope Francis.

• The Pope must speak as the Successor of Peter, as the Bishop of Rome, to the universal Church, on matters of faith and morals, deciding upon a matter that he must say is already revealed in Sacred Revelation.

He’s never fulfilled that last condition, that it’s already revealed. He’s always wanting to surpass God’s revelation with his Hegelian-Rahnerian dialectic — call it “synodality” — that democratically comes up with new doctrine, new morality, new liturgy, whatever it is that we think we like at the time, or are told to like from on high.

But say that it could happen, that the Pope is wrong. That wouldn’t mean that we ignore him, correct him, unseat him, burn him at the stake, say that he’s not a nice guy or something like that; it would just mean that there is no such thing as the Church at all. That’s it. Done. Pfft.

It can’t happen. That’s what infallible means. God will provide that he will die first, be incapacitated first. Period. Is “dialogue” among the faithful and a petition to the hierarchy expected by our Lord? Yes. He explicitly speaks of it. But then there is a process to follow with hierarchical decisions to be made. There is but one who decides. But there is a richness to be expected among so many. Little Duns Scotus might have to correct the Church. It’s a hierarchical family of faith. But families have fathers. Get it?

In all of this we must be humble, proceeding in all charity. No rancor. No bitterness. No oneupmanship. If we are arrogant and unteachable by the Most Holy Trinity, we will be cut off. But if we, by grace, submit to liberation in the living Truth of Love, whereby we die to ourselves to live for Jesus, we will rejoice.

• God forbid! The cross is not for you!
• Get behind me, Satan!

And, in the end, Peter also manifested in his own life, being crucified, that love and truth is stronger than our weakness, stronger than our darkness, stronger than death. Love and truth live! And Jesus, Divine Son of the Immaculate Conception, will come to judge the living and the dead and the world by fire. Amen.

You can’t do whatever the hell you want, Pope Francis. That’s not how it works.

I say this in charity, with all due respect.

What’s presented at the Press Conference, whatever the document entails, is not infallible. I only put all this up in hopes of minimizing any confusion.