Fiducia supplicans: this priest’s rebellion against Pope Tucho

ON THE OBLIGATION OF BISHOPS

So, this lying drivel of the office for public affairs of the USCCB in the screen shot above was iterated in the name of all the bishops of both East and West for these USA and all its territories. Those few words will encourage fence-sitting bishops and priests to do what they were always want to do whilst sitting on those razor-wire fences, fully castrated, fully effeminate. They are going to jump off those fences and afford their cowardice full manifestation, with all their effeminate brow-beating and effeminate bullying, cancelling those who stand in their way, that is, those bishops and priests and laity who are in solidarity with Jesus as He stands in solidarity with us.

Arise! Let us be going! Look! My betrayer is at hand! — And, catching sight of Judas…

Where’s my vomit bucket…

Millions… hundreds of millions are actively being scandalized and also taking in that scandal. This is the general apostasy, and the bishops, almost to a man (or trans, or whatever alphabet) are encouraging this general apostasy. This is the catalyst for the general apostasy because same-sex sex (whether you call it same-sex marriage or same-sex unions it makes no difference as it’s all totally mortally sinful with eternally hellish consequences)… because same-sex sex is destructive of the image of God, which, as we know from Genesis, is male-female-marriage-family. Any blessing of same-sex sex is a direct attack on the image of God, and therefore an attack on God Himself. This is diabolical, satanic. There is no precedent in the entire history of salvation, but the Sacred Scriptures have warned us of this general apostasy – ἀποστασία – (see 2 Thessalonians 2:3). That’s for another post.

For now, behold Ezekiel 33:5-9, for the edification and encouragement of our bishops and priests:

  • “[…] He heard the sound […] but failed to heed the warning… his blood will be on his own head. If he had heeded the warning, he would have saved his life. But if the watchman sees the sword coming and fails to […] warn the people, and the sword comes and takes away a life, then that one will be taken away in his iniquity, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood.’ As for you, O son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; so hear the word from My mouth and give them the warning from Me. If I say to the wicked, ‘O wicked man, you will surely die,’ but you do not speak out to dissuade him from his way, then that wicked man will die in his iniquity, yet I will hold you accountable for his blood. But if you warn the wicked man to turn from his way, and he does not turn from it, he will die in his iniquity, but you will have saved your life.”

So, of the hundreds of millions who will take scandal, not being warned by the bishops, the priests, the watchmen, all those bishops and priests who said NOTHING will bear all the sins of all those hundreds of millions of souls unto eternity, saith the Lord God. I don’t want that for myself. I don’t want anyone to die in their iniquity. Many laity and priests have encouraged me to shut my face. “Don’t waste your time,” they said. Instead, I want to go to heaven. I want others to go to heaven.

But will Jesus find any faith upon earth? Jesus said He would not lose even one whom the Father has given Him. He said that the time will be shortened for the sake of the elect, otherwise not one would be saved. Many are called, few are chosen. In these times of general apostasy, we will see many fall away, and many of those falling away like snowflakes falling into hell will be a surprise to us: “But I thought they were good!” We must not lose heart. We must stay with Jesus, on Calvary, with Mary, when all the Apostles ran away. John will come back. More will come back after a bit. But some will continue to run straight into hell. Don’t despair, following them to hell. Stay with Jesus, however dark, however violent it is on Calvary, on the Cross. Do you not see Mary right next to you, next to Jesus? How can you leave her, leaving Jesus. Suffer in the Church with Jesus, with Mary. Be John.

EVERY SINGLE BISHOP has the obligation before God and man to correct this blasphemy and heresy as soon as possible, and to absolutely forbid deacons and priests to bless same-sex mortally sinful relationships under pain of the declaration of application of penalties for schismatic disobedience. Of course, such a declaration will be appealed and that priest or deacon will win while Pope Tucho is in office. But that priest or deacon can also be removed, etc., etc., etc. Of course, that bishop will then be removed. Thanks be to God for another martyr for Jesus, encouraging others to stand fast by that witness which cost plenty.

EVERY SINGLE BISHOP must encourage his priests and deacons to stay faithful to Jesus, to follow Jesus, no matter what the cost. They must lead us into the fray. Where the hell are they? Or does that question answer itself?

EVERY SINGLE BISHOP must bless his faithful priests and deacons. They must do it, and do it now. Outside of Bishop Strickland and very few others, when’s the last time you saw real fatherly governance and leadership in the faith by a bishop?

How many of our cowardly, effeminate, homosexual-ism-ist bishops are going to reprimand Pope Francis? Not even one of that kind of bishop. But we pray that we will see some new heroes arise in our midst.

How many priests, who never say anything on such matters, do you think there are who are going to refuse to do such a blessing for mortal sin, especially when there are huge gifts attached to the request, especially when they know that if they do refuse, their own bishops will remove them from ministry as being pastorally unavailable, unusable, unassignable for the people of God. And they will be dismissed from the clerical state for being a liability to the (arch)diocese, you know, because if they were still actively incardinated into whatever (arch)diocese, monies would have to be paid out for salaries and insurance and such. Money!

TERMINOLOGY

Just because of the lack of terminology such as “The Sacrament of Holy Matrimony” for same-sex relationships, that doesn’t make it all better. Same sex couples live in what is objectively mortal sin, regardless or whether they call it marriage or not. Sexual activity outside Holy Matrimony is mortally sinful. Any attempt to draw down God’s blessing on mortal sin won’t happen. Say the words of the blessing, make the sign of the cross, but nothing will be brought down except condemnation to hell for eternity for all involved. Such people might convert (see 1 Corinthians 6:11). Great! But this sin is mortally sinful and brings one to hell all things being equal. The same hell awaits those bishops and priests and deacons who offer blessings for the same. All this cries out to heaven for vengeance.

The grace of a sacramental, priestly blessing, provides for that which it is invoked, the blessing of salt, oil, water, a rosary, a scapular. Sometimes people are blessed, whether, say, at the end of Mass, or individually. That’s all good. For example:

  • “Hey Father! I’m going on a dangerous mission trip tomorrow. Can I get your blessing for safety and that the will of God may be done, please?”
  • “Sure! Benedictio Dei Omnipotentis…”

But say, a same-sex couple, regardless of being active in sex with each other, but who put themselves purposely in a near occasion of mortal sin for no good reason at all, which is already a mortal sin all on its own, mind you… it being that they are fully and consciously desirous of being in that state of mortal sin, well, they cannot fruitfully receive any blessing of God at all for themselves. And the priest will also sin, mortally, in ridiculously, blasphemously, effeminately giving them a blessing, which doesn’t happen, cannot happen. God is not going to provide grace to those who are actively in rebellion against Him.

The sophistries about “actual grace” provided in the word-salad of Pope Tucho are themselves mortally sinful. Pius X, of very happy memory, condemned such sophistries as being as bad or worse than the modernism he set out to destroy in his wonderful encyclical letter (a must read) Pascendi Dominici gregis. I especially like where he cites Pope Gregory IX, of very happy memory:

  • “Some among you, inflated like bladders with the spirit of vanity strive by profane novelties to cross the boundaries fixed by the Fathers, twisting the sense of the heavenly pages . . .to the philosophical teaching of the rational[ist]s, not for the profit of their hearer but to make a show of science . . . these, seduced by strange and eccentric doctrines, make the head of the tail and force the queen to serve the servant.”

Just to be clear, because some say this Declaration is only about blessing struggling individuals when that is manifestly not true, again and again and again the Declaration makes it clear that this blessing is also for same-sex couples as same-sex couples, blessing their continuing mortally sinful relationship.

Also, just to say, none of this is ambiguous or such an impossible word-salad as everyone says. The more word-salad there is, the more sarcastically blasphemous it is, the more unambiguously, clearly, manifestly it is entirely heretical and blasphemous and scandalous. This cries out to heaven for vengeance. It is diabolical, straight out of hell, actively, with heated lust, trying, striving, agonizing to scandalize the entirety of the Lord’s Little Flock and the rest of the world.

And the point of all this is the following:

  • This is not just to destroy marriage even as the image of God so as to attack God with diabolical hatred of God and man.
  • This is about enticing souls to make a choice, in all free will, to lose faith purposely, as the mortal sin, so that they go to hell for eternity. That’s the purpose. To make people use their free will in a mortally sinful way. Don’t do it.

Now… Let’s see if the bishops will reprimand Pope Francis and his Tucho for all the world to behold.

The vision of hell is… hell… These little ones saw hell…

Eternity always comes much, much sooner than later for all of us. Don’t go to hell. Don’t say, “Well, I’ll just do the blessing now and go to confession later.” Even if you do go to confession, will you really have repented for you presumptuous sin against the Holy Spirit? Your choice, bishops, your choice. Chose well, not hell but heaven, not eternal death but eternal life.

14 Comments

Filed under Pope Francis

14 responses to “Fiducia supplicans: this priest’s rebellion against Pope Tucho

  1. Paul Maliborski

    It’s a ploy to create descension and division within the Catholic Church and its members. The pope is trying to diminish our numbers by offending Jesus. YOU CANNOT BLESS SIN.

    It’s time to stand up and show Jesus that we will not tolerate this BS. St. Michael, It’s time to do battle. Bring us together and break out the sword. Pope, Your false idols will fall and your bones will be scattered all around your alters.

    Jesus, is coming quicker than you think. He has no choice or options remaining. Pray the Rosary, as Mary has requested, and we may be spared. It’s our last chance.

    I don’t know about you? But I’m not afraid of judgement day. Repent and offer your prayers to Mary, so that she may use them as she sees fit.

    The most powerful interceder that we have is, Mary. Ask me, How do I know? We still have Father, George :)

  2. sanfelipe007

    Thanks be to God for this post, Father. The link to https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-x/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-x_enc_19070908_pascendi-dominici-gregis.html is exactly what this poor soul needs to read. Thank you.

    If a soul is struggling, approaching a priest should result in that priest directing that soul to the confessional. That is the correct avenue with the correct blessing available to all poor sinners. This is the place where the business of the Church, which is the salvation of souls, is done. Sorrow for sin with a firm amendment of behavior, then the blessing that truly heals. Jesus gave us all the Sacraments we need.

    We don’t need a faux “participation” sacrament.

  3. sanfelipe007

    I’m just getting into the reading of Pascendi, but this struck me hard:

    “Finally, and this almost destroys all hope of cure, their very doctrines have given such a bent to their minds, that they disdain all authority and brook no restraint; and relying upon a false conscience, they attempt to ascribe to a love of truth that which is in reality the result of pride and obstinacy.”

    This was directed at those who were below the Pope. But what if this spoke about the Pope himself? Today, I think it does, since Francis qualifies himself by speech and deed against the Authority of the Lord. Saint Francis, shake some sense into Francis!

  4. We must prayerfully “toughen up” and determine to follow Our Redeemer, Savior and Founder no matter what!

  5. sanfelipe007

    I’d say that the following is happening right now:
    “18…Lastly, guided by the theory that faith must be subject to science, continuously and openly criticise the Church because of her sheer obstinacy in refusing to submit and accommodate her dogmas to the opinions of philosophy; while they, on their side, after having blotted out the old theology, endeavor to introduce a new theology which shall follow the vagaries of their philosophers.”
    – Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis

    • Father George David Byers

      With your copy also of Siri’s Gethsemane, there’s one more thing for you to do… It has been my mainstay all these years of craziness… Memorize the canons of the Council of Trent on grace. You’ll never regret it. Modernism is but the result of Luther’s rebellion. Trent is the counter-reformation.

      • sanfelipe007

        “Modernism is but the result of Luther’s rebellion.”

        Ah. It’s beginning to make sense – I completely missed studying the counter-reformation. Good advice on memorizing the canons of the Council of Trent on Grace. I’ll need a mainstay, too, if I am going to be paying closer attention – and it looks like I’m headed that way. Thank you, Father.

  6. sanfelipe007

    I just received my copy of Gethsemene, yesterday. That took longer than I thought it would.

    • Father George David Byers

      I think you will appreciate his exact understanding of Sacred Tradition as faith univocally spoken by the Holy Spirit into our souls. Sacred Tradition is not any Council or ex-Cathedra pronouncement or the unanimous Church Fathers but rather it is provided by the Holy Spirit. As Trent put it, Tradition is not handed on by hand, but only almost as if by hand, quasi per manus. Scott Hahn and all the other icons of orthodoxy get this dead, dead wrong. They are still stuck in the Reformation.

      • sanfelipe007

        What perfect timing, Father. I just completed reading chapter two, and that is exactly what I understood about both sources of revelation; Holy Scripture and Tradition:

        “Man cannot have an understanding,either of the language of nature,or of the word of man, or of the inspired Word, unless it be correlated with the word that he has had within him from his origin and that transmits itself and grows richer.”

        I am enjoying Gethsemane.

  7. Aussie Mum

    “Stay with Jesus, however dark, however violent it is on Calvary, on the Cross. Do you not see Mary right next to you, next to Jesus? How can you leave her, leaving Jesus. Suffer in the Church with Jesus, with Mary. Be John.”
    Those words bring the daily Rosary to mind, the prayers of the Rosary and meditating upon its mysteries opening up the Gospel and drawing us into it: Our Lady standing both next to her Son and next to us, keeping us together, day by day leading us deeper into His Sacred Heart through her Rosary.
    Fatima comes to mind …
    It was June (1917), the month of the Sacred Heart, when Lucia asked, “Am I to stay here alone?”
    Our Lady replied, “No, my daughter. Are you suffering a great deal? Don’t lose heart. I will never forsake you. My Immaculate Heart will be your refuge and the way that will lead you to God.”
    Francisco, who did not hear Our Lady’s words, asked: “Why did Our Lady have a Heart in her hand, spreading out over the world that great light which is God? You were with Our Lady in the light which went down towards the earth, and Jacinta was with me in the light which rose towards heaven!”
    “That is because you and Jacinta will soon go to Heaven,” Lucia replied, “while I, with the Immaculate Heart of Mary, will remain for some time longer on earth.”
    “How many years longer will you stay here?” he asked.
    “I don’t know. Quite a lot,” Lucia replied.
    “Was it Our Lady who said so?” he asked.
    “Yes, and I saw it in the light that she shone into our hearts,” Lucia replied.
    Lucia died the same year as Pope John Paul II (2005). Chaos could have broken out then since the St Gallen “Mafia” had apparently planned for Jorge Bergoglio to succeed JPII but God mercifully intervened and Pope Benedict XVI was elected, yet we got that “mafia’s” choice when Benedict stepped aside /abdicated /retired (2013).
    The general apostasy seems to have arrived but we have the Rosary drawing us into the refuge of Mary’s Immaculate Heart, keeping us close to her Son through all the troubles until her Heart triumphs and evil is destroyed. As in St John Bosco’s vision, the barque of Peter – the Church – comes through a terrible persecution safe and sound, anchored between two pillars: the Blessed Eucharist and the Mother He so very kindly shares with us.

    • sanfelipe007

      Quite right Mum. I found that passage beautiful and consonant, simple ad resonant with Truth.
      @Father George:
      I would re-title Chapter 5 of “Geth” as “Fizzbin.” How well I know the Modernists game of re-definition. It’s everywhere in society as well as STEM (science, technology, engineering, and “racist” math).
      Remember the Star Trek episode “A piece of the action?” Kirk distracts his captors by inventing the card-game “fizzbin.” Siri’s Three Expressions of the New Current explains how the Modernists create and play their version of “fizzbin.” Now I realize you already know this, but let me discuss one sentence that caused me to pause due to style:
      “It is a hopeless effort, for the terms of a language, as nuanced and subtle as one may wish them to be, must have an intrinsic, universal, real reference in order to be universal, true, and efficacious.”
      This made perfect sense to me, but my mind found the phrase “intrinsic, universal, real reference in order to be universal, true, and efficacious” a bit too naked a tautology -using “universal” twice. I would presume to re-write it as “intrinsic, functional, real reference in order to be integral, efficacious, and true”
      I know it omits “universal” which may be the central point, since he uses it twice. Have I ruined his thought,though? Changed his meaning? Was his precise phrasing germane to what he will say later? I guess I’ll find out.
      I am enjoying this book, thank you very much.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.