Tag Archives: Humor

Humor! GREAT T-Shirt trolling antipatriotic trolls seen at church. Hah!

It’s perhaps a barometer of violence on university campuses far from this quiet paradise of WNC when the violent communist perps of that violence make their presence known here. This is the smallest, remotest parish in North America. Why would anyone want to bother us? Is the ignorance and violence so very widespread that there is overflow even here? Here’s what happened:

(1) I put up pictures of a great patriotic jacket which appeared at church the other week.

(2) An ultra-low information internet troll guy calling himself Chucky chucked a most low-information and quite violent comment on that post (which didn’t make it through the moderation queue). “DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!” is good advice.

  • “But Father George! Father George! You’re such an ol’ meanie! I bet you didn’t even offer Chucky a safe space, did you? Huh? Huh? I bet you didn’t! For shame, Father George!”

Oh, I have a safe space for Chucky, alright. Chucky seems to live conveniently near the FBI stations surrounding Olathe, Nebraska, so he would have to travel pretty far to get here. I call the safe-space “The Confessional”. Hey! It’s refurbished with a soundproof door along with a wall-sized double-paned sound-proof window! We’re all set whether he wants to go to Confession or throw a tantrum.

He subscribed to the blog so we can expect more tantrums before any Sacramental Confession, but I’m hoping he’ll make a pilgrimage and use the Confessional especially for Sacramental Confession. All are welcome! as they say.

(3) Meanwhile, our great patriot wearer of patriotic jackets came to Holy Mass again yesterday, this time wearing, as if scripted, a great patriotic T-Shirt pictured atop this post. It’s the perfect answer to the hate-filled comment which Chucky the anti-American troll-guy chucked into the comments box. And our patriot hadn’t even seen it.

Chucky, the troll-guy, let me tell you, has deep problems with his would-be education in etymological issues. He starts his rant by proclaiming (with four letter words) that “patriot” doesn’t come from “pater”. So let’s lower ourselves admittedly with great fanfare of condescension, and ask Chucky a question about a particular varmint of preference to him:

  • How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood?

Will Chucky keep chucking his trolling comments? How many chuckings can Chucky chuck? He subscribed to the blog to make sure that he would chuck as much as he could chuck such chuckings.

  • A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood”… and…

This is getting silly because some humor is needed. Is Chucky perhaps an FBI troll baiting reactions? Probably. Chucky is so perfectly out-of-control throwing spittle-flecked nutties that Chucky is, well, a caricature. It’s like refined stupidity, well studied stupidity, a text-book paradigm of stupidity, which, say, a just-graduated FBI agent would use to bait reactions. It’s almost AI-Stupid. But it’s even more adverbially stupidy.

1 Comment

Filed under Humor, Patriotism

Not what we’re looking for in the priesthood. Humor. Except there’s so much truth.

MEMO

To: Paul of Tarsus, Independent Missionary, Corinth, Greece
From: CYA Missionary Board

Dear Mr. Paul:

We recently received an application from you for service under our Board.

It is our policy to be as frank and open-minded as possible with all our applicants. We now have an exhaustive study of your case. To be plain, we are surprised that you have been able to pass as a bona fide missionary.

We are told that you are afflicted with severe eye trouble. This is certain to be an insuperable handicap to an effective ministry. Our Board requires 20/20 vision.

Is it true that you have a jail record? Certain brethren report that you did two years’ time at Caesarea, and were imprisoned at Rome too. You made so much trouble for the businessmen at Ephesus that they refer to you as “the man who turned the world upside down.” Sensationalism has no place in the missions. We also deplore your lurid “over the wall in a basket” episode at Damascus.

We are appalled at the obvious lack of conciliatory behavior. Diplomatic men are not stoned and dragged out of the city gate, or assaulted by furious mobs. Have you ever considered that gentler words might gain you friends? Why, we even read in one place where all men turned against you, those of like faith too. I am enclosing for your edification a copy of Dallas Carnegus’ book entitled, How to Win Jews and InfluenceGreeks.

Your ministry has been far too flighty to be successful. First Asia Minor, then Macedonia, then Greece, then Italy, and now you are talking of a wild goose chase into Spain. Have you not suspected that a nice cozy spot in some permanent location might do more good? Concentration is more important than dissipation of one’s powers. You cannot win the whole world by yourself. You are just one little Paul!

In a recent sermon you said, “God forbid that I should glory in anything save the cross of Christ. ” It seems to us that you ought also to give some glory to our heritage, our denominational program, the unified budget, and the World Federation of Churches. And by all means don’t forget the League of Consensus and the Society of Niceness.

It’s amusing to us how you say you do the work of an evangelist when there are just a few of you romping around the countryside. Our method is to spend months in promoting evangelistic campaigns. With a full house, there’s bound to be some action: your methods are too uncertain.

And who do you think you are in telling our church leaders that you long to impart some spiritual blessing to them! Are they not educated enough to have their own blessing? Frankly, Mr. Paul, it’s a trifle too humbling to have plain ordinary men like yourself stand on the same platform with our titled professionals.

Dr. Luke reports that you are a thin little man, bald, frequently sick, and always so agitated over your little church groups that you sleep very poorly. He states that you pad around the house praying half the night. A healthy mind and a robust body is what we expect and require.

You recently wrote to Timothy that you had “fought a good fight.” Fighting is hardly a recommendation for a missionary. No fight is a good fight. Jesus came not to bring the sword, but peace. You boast too that you fought wild beasts at Ephesus. What on earth do you mean?

It hurts me to tell you this, Paul, but in my 25 years of experience I have never met a man who is so opposite to the requirements of this Mission Board. If we were to accept you, we would be breaking almost every rule in modern missionary practice.

Mr. Heady High-Minded
Director of the MISSIONARY BOARD

[[Slightly edited, this was given to me more than 40 years ago. It could have been written today.]]

3 Comments

Filed under Humor, Priesthood, Vocations

Extortion deadline: Good Friday

This was postmarked, I’m guessing, at exactly 9:50 AM, but verifiably on Wednesday, 13 March, 2024. It was $9.85 for the postage. For one piece of paper. The irony of the timing is absolutely stunning. I note that I’m given exactly 10 days to get my response post-marked (by Good Friday), or else. That’s a very rigid, legalistic period of time in this era of anything goes.

This must be serious. I can hardly wait to open it. It’s so exciting.

Yep. It’s what I’ve been expecting for a long time: the extorting of protection money.

A-w-e-s-o-m-e

The intrigue! The suspense! Where’s the popcorn! // off sarcasm

The boring truth is that I am being extorted for a tidy sum of money which is not mine though I’m in charge of it, and that money has a specific intention attached to it by the donors, that it is NOT to go to those who traffic children from the border all the way to Western North Carolina. If I were to hand over the money for that purpose I may well go to prison on a raft of charges. You gotta use the money for that for which it was intended. Or give it back. That’s all ignored.

Meanwhile, the traffickers themselves have asked me three times to deliver unvetted kids to unvetted recipients. I didn’t do that. Now money is desired to fund their activities, or else the extortionists will bring about the irreparable harm they threaten in the letter. They have delineated their methodology and the schedule of events. So exciting!

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic Charities, Child Protection, Child trafficking, Humor

Keto Recipe Humor: Salad w/Bacon bits

The best parishioners in the world put this together for me at our monthly social after Holy Mass.

With a keto diet…

  • … you don’t crave carbs
  • … you have more energy, a better energy
  • … you quickly make daily progress once you’re into ketosis
  • … everything tastes better because, you know, bacon

And when it’s doctor’s orders, whad-dya-gonna-do?

Last time I did this I was losing 0.6 pounds a day. We’ll see how it goes this time.

6 Comments

Filed under Diet, Humor, Recipes

Recipes: Salad with bacon bits (it’s all in the proportions and presentation). Humor.

This was basically my KETO diet a few years back, which really worked well. Bacon is just soooo expensive these days. What to do?

7 Comments

Filed under Diet, Humor

Humor! Gotta wonder if there’s people like this in the corridors of power across the pond.

Analogy: If there are people like Yosemite Sam over yonder, and you are getting attacked by them, well, I think Bugs sets a great example of how to deal with such tantrums. Don’t lose your peace because someone else can’t stand that you’re with Jesus.

2 Comments

Filed under Humor

More on bacon health benefits!

4 Comments

2023-10-31 · 4:30 am

Coffee cups appropriate for priests

There are lots of coffee cups that say things like: “Our priest is an angel” or “Our priest is a saint.” Trust me. That’s inappropriate. Those quietly go right in the trash. Instead, humor is good.

“‘That’s too much bacon’ ~ said no one ever.”

I like that.

8 Comments

Filed under Humor

Mobility aids for +/- ambulatory: attitudes, tips, questions

There are such things as ambulatory wheelchair users who can stand for a few seconds before collapsing. I was one of those for a while. The picture above is typical because of a lack of accessible bathrooms, which are often up a flight of stairs this gentleman, for instance, could not use, and so has to humiliate himself. Too bad, that. I’m guessing from the plaster work and pavement that this is Rome, Italy. That’s likely a fake picture by a politician trying to prove a point because he’s good enough to fight for those who are often forgotten. Anyway…

Here’s a partial list of mobility aids for the +/- ambulatory population with some comments and tips and questions coming mostly from my own experience with the spectrum of what is +/- ambulatory. Circumstances are unrepeatable. Comments offering diverse experiences are most welcome.

  1. Handicapped parking placard: I have that through my doctor, through the state. But I would hate to use it. Episodically, if it’s a terribly bad day for the leg…. I dunno…. I’ll probably still not use it. I would be soooo self-conscious. I’m not disabled “enough,” or I’m too young to be disabled, or I otherwise look too healthy to use it. And besides that, here’s an indisputable FACT: there are people much, much worse off than me. I don’t like this option. I have it, but I’m an expert at making myself feel guilty. Am I right? I think the guilt means I’m right. But…
  2. Canes: These are, for me, totally unstable, uncontrollable, tripping me up. Just one is useless. Two are doubly unstable, uncontrollable, less than useless. My arms are all over the place because I can’t help but also use them for weight bearing, which they’re not made for. They’re made for just a light touch for tippiness. And… and… they’re the worst on ice and snow or wet floors. Am I doing it all wrong? Are these only for the slightest aid in balance?
  3. Canadian crutches, you know, with the extended braces behind the elbows. I’ve periodically used those for very many years. In fact, I bought an extra pair for parishioners and they loved them. The problem is that because of a hereditary condition, any trauma to the hands such as that kind of episodic weight bearing pressure will make my hands swell up as big as melons for days on end. No, really, as big as melons like cantaloupe. That happened uncountable times when I had a huge Ilizarov apparatus on my leg and I ended up finally using these kind of crutches continuously for some years. I would buy, and still do buy shirts and jackets and soutanes and (if possible) albs with sleaves many inches too long so as to hide this episodic disability of hands the size of melons if I’m using weight bearing crutches. So, I don’t like this option. Now that I’m putting on some years, no hands for days can be difficult. But if you can use Canadian crutches, these are the ones that are lightest, with the best padded handles. Also, I don’t know how many times I’ve fallen because of ice and snow and wet floors trusting any crutches. They are as good as mere canes when it comes to the weather. Falls like this are always extremely hard falls, instantaneous. There’s no good way to fall.
  4. Tall hiking sticks: These would be about chest high, so that, in grasping them, they are just for balance, not for weight bearing. Some companies make “sticks” analogous to extra-long downhill ski poles. These are also bad on ice and snow on pavement, and wet floors. Also, two hiking sticks are ridiculously inconvenient because of their length. Yet, there are surprising benefits. Even I could do a bit of weight bearing. It’s a different mechanism: you’re pulling down on the handles instead of pushing yourself up with crutches. Or am I wrong on this?
  5. Walkers! Walkers are supremely annoying when you have merely episodic disability, which is my case. It’s the ol’ “I never fall… until I do.” The stability and support of walkers are great. There are those with wheels, but those can get away from you, and down you go. There are those with tennis balls, which wear out so quickly on parking lots. The tennis balls are quite dangerous to cut open. I like the option of handbrakes or not, seats or not, storage bags or not, etc. But I would be afraid to fall on top of a walker, breaking ribs and arms. I’ve stayed away from these. Am I wrong?
  6. Shopping carts: These are perfect “walkers” that can be used even if you take your own walker with you wherever you go. Shopping carts solve many problems with walkers mentioned above. I park next to shopping cart corrals in parking lots while going grocery shopping for myself and parishioners. Here’s a small business start-up idea: wouldn’t it be great if one could buy a light, plastic fold-down seat over the internet, a seat which would snap on to the side of a shopping cart and fold up out of the way, you know, just to take a minute for a break, or to sit down on while getting something from the bottom self in supermarkets?
  7. Service-dogs: For this mobility service you have to really start with a younger dog and a fairly large-sized dog. The cost of training for the service they would provide, and to make the dog publicly accessible (no barking, no distraction, no lunging, recall, good for on or off leash heel, etc.)… all that’s rather expensive and takes time. And… and… this is an entirely different way of life. This is a living being which needs food and water and attention and activity and a safe place to run around when off duty, has poop and pee needs, needs washing and brushing and medical care with regular visits to the veterinarian…). Most service dogs were originally for the blind. Now they’re for all sorts of medications and conditions, including for mobility. Regarding the latter, which I’m interested in, I’m thinking that the mechanism is again quite different than any weight bearing for crutches or pulling down for hiking sticks. In the case of service dogs for mobility, it seems to me that this would be all about pulling up slightly on, say, a bridged rigid handle clipped onto both sides of a tactical service-dog vest so as to provide support for mobility at one’s own speed, stopping, starting, turning, juxtaposed to oneself at every instant, able to do steps, canted sidewalks, curbs, ice, snow, wet floors, whatever, with agility and dependability. Upon a fall, one might want to use the large dog’s shoulders for assistance in getting up when there’s nothing else around, such as in the middle of a parking lot, or when crossing the street. And I have fallen in heavy Roman traffic, thankful that the guy saw me and was able to brake in time. We both laughed. It wasn’t a trip on the cobblestones. The leg just instantaneously caved for seemingly no reason, though there is. And I was down.
  8. Wheelchairs: Some people can’t stand the thought of a wheelchair and would rather die before getting into a wheelchair. There is terrible prejudice against people in wheelchairs, also by those who should know better but do not act accordingly. But I digress. I LOVE WHEELCHAIRS! I haven’t publicly used a wheelchair for a long time. I can go for miles on two wheels, and did, on cobblestone streets in Rome, without ever putting the front two wheels down. FACT: I could and would do more in a wheelchair for all parochial duties of saying Holy Mass, hearing confessions, doing up Last Rites and Communion Calls at hospitals, rehabs, nursing homes and people’s private homes, more than about any priest anywhere. Anyway, there are ramps and sloped parking lots and hills. What to do? This is what you do, the best invention for a wheelchair ever! This is a reseller. I got my own years ago from the original company in Eastern Europe many years ago, but their family website (Dessiv) was hacked. The link seems to sell for them now from Florida. Great equipment. Well worth the price. And then there’s this front wheel gadget, which I haven’t gone near, as I don’t need this at all, at least not right now, but, wow, very, very cool…
  9. Store scooters: Almost never available, and if you do find them abandoned in the back ends of stores, it’s because the batteries are worn out on the far side of the store. Right now, someone else needs them more than me. A question for those of you who must use them: Have you tried to turn one of these massive scooters with the huge baskets around in a handicap restroom stall in, say, a Walmart? And besides: Beep! Beep! Beep! Grr.
  10. Personal scooters: I don’t need them now, but I know what to look for, which is narrow width and not lengthy so as to ably navigate small living quarters, bathrooms, bedrooms, kitchens… With these you might have to look into hydraulic lifts or platforms or ramps to transport them.

Shadow-dog is going on 8 years old and he’s the perfect gentleman. I looked up GSDs. Some placed the lower end of life expectancy at 7 years, some 8 years, maxing out at 11 years, or more rarely 13 years.

“The bigger they are, the shorter their life” is all I’m hearing now, or “only the good die young” with Shadow-dog being a goood daaawg!

Shadow-dog was at the Vet just yesterday morning and declared to be fit for bringing, say, to the nursing home and rehab to lift the spirits of those who are there. He would also still be fit as a “mobility aid” service dog, you know, for a bridge handle to pull up on. But… No… Shadow dog is retired. And I don’t need a service dog right this second.

7 Comments

Filed under Disability, Humor

Impairment unto disabled handicap: condescending definitions abound. Last laugh.

In reading up a bit on impairment, disability and being handicapped, I noted this from Emery School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia: “As traditionally used…

  • impairment refers to a problem with a structure or organ of the body;
  • disability is a functional limitation with regard to a particular activity;
  • “and handicap refers to a disadvantage in filling a role in life relative to a peer group.”

All things being equal, I think that’s all quite exact, appropriate and respectful, regardless of what any wokista karen might have to insist upon for entitled vocabulary adjustments as noted so incisively and humorously by Ahren Belisle in the AGT video above.

But not all things are always equal:

  • Police can impound your car if you’re driving while impaired. Wait, what? A double-amputee is disallowed to use hand controls?
  • A vehicle can be towed for being disabled. I had no idea. I wonder what the icon on the disabled placard would look like. Perhaps a wheel-less vehicle up on cement blocks.
  • Traditionally, being handicapped actually refers to having your cap in your hand, begging for some loose change, somewhat like Oliver Twist asking for more gruel.

That’s just so “classist.” But the good doctors and nurses at Emory are spot on. The relative peer group actively disadvantages you into begging, cap in hand, because they don’t want you filling a role in life better than them despite your being impaired and disabled, showing them up, because, you know, they are so very “special” in their “normality”. It’s “normal” for them to get rid of you. They are aloof, arrogant. They don’t even see you anymore. You’re invisible.

Here’s the ferocious logic of fallen human nature:

  • An impairment may make you disabled, but not necessarily.
  • A disability may be the opportunity for your peers to force you into the state of being handicapped.
  • Being handicapped, relative to a peer group, might come about even if there is no impairment or actual disability whatsoever. Yep. That’s mentioned in the ADA, Federal law. That means this happens really a lot.

Outside of the good doctors and nurses at Emery, it’s likely that these terms are interchangeable for the entire rest of the oblivious population. That was the case for me until writing this very post, and I myself have lived in all three of these categories. I’m so “normal”, even though I’m so “special.” Fictional usage of vocabulary provoking mind games takes one out of reality:

But currents run deep. Regardless of the terminology and even purposed misusage, the three levels of being “challenged” are clearly delineated in the fallen psyche of mankind. For example, in the various states of impairment, disability and being handicapped that I have experienced in my own life, I have personally heard, as a priest, the following dismissive definitions also from other priests and seminarians:

  • Impairment: “What a loser!” [This was declared ever so loudly, dismissively and with real anger at my continued existence when I was limping rather severely, hardly able to climb or descend even a short staircase, but I could.]
  • Disability: “Your crutches make it impossible for you to do what you’re doing. Give up!” [And while it was difficult back in the day when I was on crutches, I made my life work and I did what I had to do, gauging times and methods, but getting the job done.]
  • Handicap: “A wheelchair?! You can’t be assigned to a parish like that. You can’t do anything at all. You’re useless. Go away! Awww… there, there now, we’ll do what’s best for you and we will make a decision for you that is best for you and everyone else (the kind of condescension that is usually followed with a light pat on the head).” [This was quite recent, when it came up that there’s a slight possibility that I might end up in a wheelchair yet again. This is lockstep with what I’ve met for years right around the world, and not at all hypothetically.]

Sorry for ranting. My bad. Let’s lighten it up again:

2 Comments

Filed under Disability, Humor