Analysis: Synod penalties. But I’m apostate.

A couple of questions for discussion in the working document for the upcoming Synod on Synodality:

• 7) How can we deal constructively with cases in which those in authority feel they cannot confirm the conclusions reached by a community discernment process, taking a decision in a different direction? What kind of restitution should that authority offer to those who participated in the process?

Translation: You will agree with us or we will toss you on the far side of the peripheries. But – Hey! – I’m already there!

So, what if conclusions of the Synod include rubbish like the blessing of sodomy? No one who wants to go to heaven can confirm that. What to do?

A good priest told me that he would sign any declaration stating that he affirmed all the conclusions of the Synod, but he would add the words “except anything sinful.”

But, that’s not good enough. The methodology of the Synod itself is wrong. It’s not God. It’s just us.

Say that you could receive the right to life in two different ways. One right to life is inalienable because it is from God. The other right to life is from the government with no reference to God at all, and so governmentally granted right to life is not inalienable. If man can grant that right to life, man can take it away. Well, you’re going to choose the right to life that comes from God.

Even if a conclusion from the Synod is something which, on its face, is good, such as “To honor thy father and thy mother is good,” I still would not sign on to that conclusion coming specifically from the Synod. Yet, I would easily accept the commandment in the ten commandments in Divine Revelation about honoring father and mother. The difference is God makes no exceptions. Bergoglio and surely his blah blah sycophants think that in some circumstances mothers are to be mocked as rabbits, you know, for having more than two or three children. It’s not the same thing. The source is different. That makes a difference. The Synod might be right, by mistake, as it were, on this or that point. A broken clock is correct twice a day. On principle, I will accept any correct time of day, but I will ignore the broken clock.

What that means is that I won’t sign any declaration regarding the Synod, not even with extensive explanations. The whole thing is wrong. The whole thing is a sin, a blasphemy. It is anti-Christ in the extreme. If a correct statement from the Synod such as “God is good” is made just because it is the democratic will of the people at this moment in time, but maybe not tomorrow, that’s insufficient. We accept that God is good both because of right reason and because of Divine Revelation, not because of the fickle polling of fallen human beings who are proud of their sin.

What kind of restitution will non-confirmers of Synodal conclusions have to offer to the believers of the Bergoglian democratic church? I don’t care. I have nothing to do with it. It has no authority. I’m apostate, standing away off, from such an Ape of the Church.

I follow Christ Jesus. I believe in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

I belong to Jesus, and no one can rip me out of His wounded hands.