What about Southern white boys sayin’ “all y’all uz…”?
What about Southern white boys sayin’ “themz iz…”?
What about Southern white boys sayin’ “you’unz…”?
And more than that, what if you just can’t keep up with everyone’s moment to moment idiocy?
What if you’re hearing impaired?
What if you can’t read lips?
What if you’re just not smart enough, don’t have a good enough immediate memory to keep up with all the moment to moment changes?
What if it’s all too disgusting, lowering any possible conversation to up-to-the-nanosecond sexual desires of a pronoun-Nazi.
These guys (oops!) are a bunch of meanie pronoun-enablists, therefore racists, who hate those who don’t have such skills!
For my part, just on the level of abilities or lack thereof, it’s all changing so quickly that I honestly just can’t keep up. I don’t even know the definitions for LGBTQIA+. I have no idea. They’re all in error whatever they are. That means if you actually make sense of them you are in error as well. I don’t even start. Don’t waste your time trying to explain them to me. I don’t wanna know.
And, btw, why couldn’t I just insist on someone’s birth sex and birth name and consonant pronouns and have some entitled dragger be fired from their jobs and thrown in prison for not respecting my perspective, you know, because they’re… I dunno… racist?
UPDATE: Pretty much all my epic days off, Tuesdays, are spent some hundreds of miles round trip away at a Veterans Administration Hospital. I saw this T-Shirt just now. Lol. Do I need to apologize?
That’s my friend whose standing in that picture above, Msgr Carl Eugene Morris. Great image. So racist, right? A Jew worshipped by Catholics, black and white, black standing, white kneeling. Enter the apoplectic FBI:
Some definitions implicating the FBI in criminal discrimination against believing Catholics:
“Radical” – From radix = root. To be radical, to be at one with the source and summit of one’s very existence, with the Creator, the Most High, is, for the FBI, THE mortal sin. Why’s that? Because a believer who is at one with the goodness and kindness and living Truth of Jesus Christ extracts one from being an unthinking puppet of the FBI. For the FBI, goodness and kindness and truth are THE evil that must be… wait for it… eradicated from society. In other words, the FBI wants to eradicate Jesus Christ Himself from society. The FBI hates Jesus. They should reconsider.
“Traditionalist” – This is, of course, redundant to “radical” and “catholic” and believer. It simply means that one receives Sacred Tradition from the Holy Spirit as saving faith that comes with sanctifying grace, the indwelling of the Most Holy Trinity, and is therefore the same as God is always the same in perfection and truth. It is, as Cardinal Siri helpfully said, univocal. Una voce. One voice. Tradition is NOT the mere sum of ex-Cathedra statements or our human assent (theology) to the divine faith given to us by the Holy Spirit. The Council of Trent said that the faith only seems to be handed on (see tradere), but that this only happens quasi per manus, almost as if by hand, but that this handing on of the faith is wrought by the Holy Spirit. When the FBI uses “traditionalist” as a pejorative, it is blaspheming the Holy Spirit, the unforgivable sin. They ought best back away from such strident commentary for the sake of their own eternal souls. God will not be mocked.
“Catholic” – from Greek: kata + holos, regarding the entirety, universal, everyone. As we read in the bible, this is for every tribe, tongue, people, nation, throughout time. To be Catholic is to be embracing of every race to bring all to the fulness of Living Truth who is Christ Jesus, for those who want this. You cannot be a racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist and be Catholic at the same time. No. That would be to insult Jesus crucified as He embraces and draws to Himself all who will, all things being equal, assent to this in grace. The FBI goes before the Judge, blaspheming Him. They should reconsider.
“Pre-Vatican II teachings and traditions” – There is no such thing as a pre-Vatican II teaching or tradition. No. Truth is truth is truth. God is with us until the end of time. His Living Truth did not disappear just because “someone did something” across the pond in the 1960s. Pfft. Let’s look at it this way: most all heresies are pre-Vatican II, and were expressed in Latin. Ooo! … Look. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever. There are always heretics, such as those in the FBI. Whatever. By God’s grace, I want to stay with Jesus, even today. I was born before Vatican II, baptized before Vatican II, therefore I was a believer by sanctifying grace before Vatican II. By grace it is possible for me to enjoy the same sanctifying grace, the same Living Truth of the Son of the Living God still today, exactly the same today as when I was baptized. Same for you. Regardless of any Vatican II. Whatever about a bunch of old farts who are by and large dead. Let’s do an analogy: God-given rights also enumerated in, say, the first amendment of the Constitution of these USA are God-given before and after the Constitution was written. Truth is truth regardless of whatever it is that man does or doesn’t do. But FBI analysts using DARPA Compass yin-yang gaming theory cannot fathom this, and thus block themselves out of true analysis for pretty much 100% of the population.
“Abortion rights” – There is no right to murder the innocent, the least of the brethren, the very image of God as defined in Genesis. The FBI, “theologians” and philosophers that they think they are, stridently claims there is a right against Natural Law to murder the innocent. The Natural Law isn’t a Catholic opinion. It applies to all. Not murdering the innocent is demanded by God for all. But we must sacrifice children to the pagan gods, shrieks the FBI. Oh, how the FBI hates God, neighbor and themselves. Too bad, that. What dark and miserable souls they must have in such hatred. Those murdered babies will be their judges, and those babies will all be grown up and unable to be murdered anymore in heaven. The FBI should rethink what they’re up to. “Abortion rights”? Pfft. God has the right to throw the murderers into hell for eternity.
“Immigration” – There is legal immigration. Great! But the FBI is talking about how much they love protecting human trafficking and sex trafficking by the cartels at the open border. I gotta wonder if they’re receiving billions in kick-backs from the cartels. Fighting the cartels isn’t about stopping drugs. It’s about human trafficking and sex-trafficking of the absolute worst kind. And that brings in incomparably more money than drugs. Yep. The FBI facilitates this. And they facilitate terrorists and spies from all parts of the globe, Russia, China, North Korea, Iran…
“Affirmative action” – Wait… What? That’s still going on after Ben Carson dismembered and spit out Joey having the FBI give Hunter a job at Burisma energy firm in Ukraine? Or am I confused? ;-)
“LGBTQ protections” – What does that even mean? Does it mean imprisoning parents who don’t want drag queens copulating with kids during story hour in public grade schools? And what does that tell us about the FBI?
As you can see, I have lost all respect for the FBI. But that’s based on what they say, what they do, how they act. They went after Mark Houck? To belong to the FBI at this point is like belonging the Gestapo or, if the irony is too great for the head of the DOJ, Merrick Garland, then I say it’s like belonging to the Stasi, right, Chrissie Wray, or maybe the Федеральная служба безопасности Российской Федерации?
Hey! Chrissie Wray! Where do you stand? You have not retracted your profiling of Catholics. You have simply “taken steps”, but it’s still on all the servers to this day, and that profiling clocks in with the top three searches on FBI research systems. It’s been up for months. It was approved for the whole FBI, not just Richmond. You say you’re disappointed in the sourcing, but that only means that you want to hunt down an anecdote and republish a now well-resourced profiling of an entire class of people. That’s literally what terrorists do, by definition. You see, Chrissie Wray, in my experience here in far-far Western North Carolina, the white robed and hooded knuckleheads are free to go because you know that they are murderously and equally against blacks and Jews and, get this, wait for it… Catholics. All three. Yep. So what you’re really saying, Chrissie Wray, is that you and the FBI have all donned the white robes and hoods of those white supremacists, and you are racist, and anti-Semitic, and murderously anti-Catholic, is that right? Just a question for you. But all things point to a certain answer, right? I say this as a service to you.
Anyway, just my opinion, I think someone should start Constitutional litigation, hauling the FBI before the Supreme Court so as to have these violent radical extremist FBI personnel thrown into Federal prison. Just my opinion.
Oh, I forgot. The FBI has partnered with Google and media groups to suppress any opinion which upholds Constitutional rights. So, only one or two people will read this, comment, and make me think my blog is still up.
BTW: What the FBI has done is to provide all the elements of the definition for domestic terrorists, but they’re really defining themselves as domestic terrorists, you know, going after a certain class of people with violent penalties? Are they getting paid to do this, by, say, rich white guys? And then they solve the problem by way of a new Kristallnacht? And isn’t that RICO? Isn’t that domestic terrorism wrought by the State. Too bad, that. But, as I say, Christ Jesus will come to judge the living and the dead and the world by fire. Amen.
The absolutely foreseeable effect of the recent FBI’s profiling of sincerely believing Catholics as racist violent extremists, and, therefore, as domestic terrorists, is the same as the FBI inviting mass shooters to do up mass executions of Catholics in and outside of their churches without penalties. The FBI coldly calls this “mitigation opportunities.”
The DOJ, at the FBI’s bidding, is NOT going to prosecute anyone who shoots up Catholic churches. Mass shooters might be temporarily detained by unknowing law enforcement, but will be released with no bail. It’s totally open season on Catholics.
Thanks a lot, Merrick Garland. Not a Catholic, are you? If you were, and you came to Mass, I would deny you Holy Communion and have you gently but firmly removed from the church property. Bringing your henchmen with you, your presence is a threat to the safety of those present. If you want to become Catholic, come see me privately. We’ll then make that public. Then you’ll be welcome. But you’ll have to resign from the Department of Justice.
Thanks a lot, Chrissie Wray. Not a Catholic, are you? If you were, and you came to Mass, I would deny you Holy Communion and have you gently but firmly removed from the church property. Bringing your henchmen with you, your presence is a threat to the safety of those present. If you want to become Catholic, come see me privately. We’ll then make that public. Then you’ll be welcome. But you’ll have to resign from the FBI.
Look: You can’t openly target a class of people as domestic terrorists, pious Catholics, and not expect that those pious Catholics will not be murdered in churches and on the streets by the crazies. But all y’all in the FBI do this baiting of the crazies on purpose.
“But Father George! Father George! They recanted! Rescinded! You’re just being judgmental, Father George! Leave the FBI alone! You’re just an ol’ meanie, Father George! Splutter, splutter!”
Oh! I forgot! Let’s look at that:
“While our standard practice is not to comment on specific intelligence products, this particular field office product – disseminated only within the FBI – regarding racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism does not meet the exacting standards of the FBI.”
That says nothing, and it’s deceptive. Emphasizing a “particular field office” and “specific intelligence products” gives the impression that this was not disseminated throughout the entirety of the FBI. It’s a system wide profiling.
Just because it is noticed that there is a lack of a multitude of footnotes, anecdotes and data doesn’t mean that the FBI disagrees with the memo. Not at all. It merely speaks of their eagerness to ramp up a flurry of specious notation.
“Upon learning of the document, FBI Headquarters quickly began taking action to remove the document from FBI systems and conduct a review of the basis for the document.”
“Upon learning of the document”? That’s total bullshit and demonstrates malice, does it not? This profiling has been fully disseminated for months. You can’t have this publicized throughout the entirety of the FBI for many months, with so many Catholics in the FBI, and reasonably think that Chrissie Wray was not informed of this in any way. Chrissie Wray learned about this from the mass media? Bullshit. THIS IS THE FBI. They know stuff.
“Began taking action to remove.” That means nothing. That doesn’t say it was removed. That doesn’t say that a new version will not take its place. This is no disavowal. This is not recanting. This is not rescinding. This is typical modus operandi of the FBI.
“The FBI is committed to sound analytic tradecraft and to investigate and prevent acts of violence and other crimes while upholding the constitutional rights of all Americans and will never conduct investigative activities or open an investigation based solely on First Amendment protected activity.”
What a bold-faced lie. That’s like Strzok testifying that he couldn’t have done anything wrong because he’s patriotic. Let’s take a look at their lie. They say that:
To offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, in Latin, ad orientem, the Traditional Latin Mass, is the very definition of racist violent extremism. Thus, there is no free exercise of religion. Believers are domestic terrorists, and are to be arrested in violent SWAT raids, likely resulting in many deaths along the way, and then imprisoned if still alive, only to be executed as the terrorists they are. Yep. Good ol’ FBI.
To be pro-life is the very definition of racist violent extremism. Thus, to pray at abortuaries so as to save lives of black babies (the ones the abortion industry targets) is somehow racist violent extremism. Good ol’ FBI, assisting in the slaughter of black babies so that they can shriek Black Lives Matter and and shriek again that Catholics who save black lives are racist violent extremists, domestic terrorists who are to be arrested, imprisoned, executed.
To proclaim that the image of the Living God – as we read in Genesis – is male/female/marriage/family is, the FBI says, itself violent racist extremism. The FBI says that for pious Catholics to encourage LGBTQAI+ people to embrace the fullness of life in Christ Jesus is racist violent extremism. Such pious Catholics are to be subject to mitigation opportunities, which means arrest, imprisonment, execution.
To question any ambiguity in the Second Vatican Council, to have an academic opinion about extremely difficult philological and literary expressions, is, the FBI insists, to be a racist violent extremist, a domestic terrorist liable to arrest, imprisonment and execution.
Etc., etc., etc.
There is no longer any free exercise of religion, no first amendment, no Constitution, no legitimate law enforcement. This is the Kristallnacht, the beginning of the extermination of pious Catholics. To repeat:
For the FBI to float such a document as policy for many months and only ambiguously make comments about it after the fact of publication to the general population, is to invite crazies, literally, to shoot up Catholics, hacking them down wherever they are found. That’s how it works, genocide by proxy.
The irony: Pope Francis promotes everyone who is pro-abortion, pro-same-sex sex, pro-LGBTQAI+ whatever, and mocks and legislates against pious Catholics who attend to the Traditional Latin Mass. And bishops think they are being Catholic while they also participate in the new Kristallnacht.
UPSHOT: Sorry, all you remaining good and pious Catholic FBI agents – and I’m sure there are many – but after this you are no longer to be trusted. If you come in to the church with all your SWAT crap, proclaiming you are FBI and you’re just there to protect our safety, instead, your presence in the parish will be considered a threat to the safety of those present. You will forthwith gently but firmly be removed from the property. We will stop everything, call in local law enforcement, and then we’ll press charges for interrupting services. If you resign from the FBI, come to tell me that privately, but not in Confession. We will then make your exit from the FBI public, and reintroduce you to the parish. But, really, otherwise, don’t cause a scene, making everyone run and scream and have heart attacks. Kristallnacht is never pretty, is it? No. The death of a nation is always tragic.
Oh, and that’s another thing. To be patriotic is, in the opinion of the FBI, to be a racist violent extremist.
So, here’s me proclaiming that:
I love the Tradition Latin Mass
I do think passages in Vatican II are ambiguous
I have prayed the Rosary, even outside abortuaries in black neighborhoods
I love my LGBTQAI+ brothers and sisters enough to call them out of that and into the fulness of life in Christ Jesus
And if all heaps slander upon me, having it that I am a racist violent extremist domestic terrorist radical Catholic, well, so be it. I will wear that as a badge. I will rejoice, and leap for joy, knowing that my reward will be great in heaven, having witnessed to the goodness and kindness and truth of Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior, who will come to judge the living and the dead and the world by fire.
GREAT PragerU street interview. Full interview, really entertaining, not much longer,HERE.
But you have heard that it was said by the USCCB, “Thou shall not criticize one political party more than another on any topic.” But here’s the deal. That interview about racism above can happen with abortion in precisely the same way, even as the main feature of that video above, as the Democrat crowd maniacally push for abortion on the level of genocide targeting the black population. Get that? But the USCCB isn’t going to reprimand Wilton Gregory for giving Holy Communion to Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden.
I’m going to criticize the Democrat party as the Democrat party. They voted God out of anything to do with anything. They are diametrically opposed to the free exercise of religion. They are shriekingly diametrically opposed to anything pro-life and are absolutely pro-death from conception to death. There are even a lot idiot RINOs, of course. But there’s no comparison between the two parties whatsoever.
I gotta wonder how underlings at the USCCB would want to smack down any priest for putting up that video above and still claim that they are the heroes of anti-racism. Pfft.
But the mid-terms are coming up, so we priests have to tread lightly, right? Wrong. The day a Bishops Conference tells me that it is “pastorally insensitive” for a priest to emphasize doctrine and morality in evangelizing is the day many priests become “pastorally insensitive.” They will say that we priests are just to avoid politics, but since 99.9% of politics involves doctrine and morality, the USCCB would be saying that priests are to avoid doctrine and morality in their evangelization.
Hahaha! Great! I love that! LOL! He’s running for U.S. Congress. This is game changing. Just so right.
The humorous video above – so very truthful – got me interested enough to check out Jerone Davison’s campaign for Congress, with the vote coming up real soon in Arizona.
First I went to see his general presentation of issues at his own website:
But then, it’s always useful to go to ballotpedia to see the answers to specific questions on surveys presented to all candidates, which include pro-life questions:
Totally. Awesome. On. All. Issues. He’s super Pro-Life.
Take that you Democrat KKK racist bag-head transvestite burqa wearing cowards… Hahahahaha!
P.S. On a personal note, my own experience with a weaponized baseball bat was in a parish of which I was pastor in the deep-deep south, well over 300 miles further south than I am now. But the bat wasn’t just wrapped in barbed wire (which can rip you to shreds), but also had dozens of large spikes hammered through it so that every hit would also be like being stabbed multiple times.
That bat was in full view in the back seat of a uniquely marked junky red car. The bat had all sorts of racist death threats written on it with paint-marker pens. That car had been parked right in front of the rectory, forcing me to walk by it to the church, all on parish property, on which we also had a parochial school. It would be half a week or so before that car was removed. It was in and of itself a hate-crime.
After some days again my own car needed some work. I asked for advice on good mechanics, and one nice lady told me to go to an out of the way garage in a back-neighborhood of a town that wasn’t close by. But, fine. I went. It took quite a while to find it. There was a guy working on another car. He didn’t see me with his head buried in the engine. I took the opportunity to mentally examine the inside of the garage in detail. I couldn’t miss seeing that same red car was on the far side of the shop, raised up on a hydraulic car lift, like, to the ceiling, all the lights turned off on that side of the shop.
Just then he emerged to see what I wanted but I somehow was able to talk my way out of getting anything done at that shop and left, feeling I had just gotten away with my life, that guy being very possibly the owner of that car and spiked baseball bat.
Such baseball bats are meant not only to smack down black people, but also Catholics and Jews.
It’s all a piece with the Democrat KKK party pushing abortions in black neighborhoods all this time.
Thank God for the Supreme Court’s defederalization of fake rights to murder kids in the womb.
Thank God for new politicians like Jerone Davison.
Here’s another guy I really like a lot, also pro-life, and I hope he becomes our governor here in North Carolina, Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson, Republican:
NOTE TO THE CANCELERS: The last time I supported a pro-life candidate over satanic pro-abortion maniacs the powers that be did their best to shut me down altogether, frantically contacting me to say that the separation of Church and State (that’s not the law) demands that I, as a priest, take down any support for Republican candidates unless I cover up and lie for the hellion pro-abort racist Demoncrats, which I cannot do.
I suppose I will immediately receive horrific pressure to take down this post, or else. Whatever.
Just some legally significant logistics: I write on my own time on my own equipment for no compensation on my own bandwidth in my own “hut” as one parishioner calls it. I own the blog. I’m the publisher, blah blah blah. … and … Hahahahaha.
The great Father Gordon J MacRae finally get’s to publish his perspective on the overturning of Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court. The Unspoken Racist Arena of Roe v. Wade
He called up this morning and asked me to go to the post, our usual on a Wednesday morning. We discussed the graphics of the post and then he asked me to review his SERP, that is, his meta-description or what we might call a lengthy sub-title:
“Catholic priests and politicians who are silent about abortion often cite racism as a higher moral priority. Are they blind to the racist oppression of Roe v. Wade?”
You have to know that black babies are by far the vast, vast majority of babies who are murdered in the womb, truly a genocide of black people, with racist, purposely genocidal Planned Parenthood putting their abortuaries in poor, black neighborhoods, defending their “rights” to kill themsleves (which has always been a goal of the Democrat party of the KKK.
So, I started to read that SERP, that metadescription out loud to him over the phone. Without missing a beat, this is how it went, sending us both into uproarious laughter over the phone:
“Catholic priests and politicians who are silent about abortion often cite racism as a higher moral priority. What a bunch of assholes.“
After our fit of laughter subsided a bit, only to return many times, Father Gordon expressed his immediate desire to edit his original with my revised edition.
Hey! On the Day Off, a Star of David. Stunningly elegant.
Hey! Another Star of David. Arrestingly beautiful.
Hey! Another Star of David. Boldness that jumps out at you.
Hey! Another Star of David. Such purity of heart, agility of soul.
Hey! Another Star of David. Such simplicity of reality. It is what it is. No ambiguity here.
These are the Stars of David that were able to be collected on just one Day Off, just the other day, at the home of friends with whom I learn Yiddish exclamations, even more than those taught to me by my mom throughout my childhood.
This presses the nostalgia button in me. I don’t remember any book that my mom recommended I read, except one. She was a voracious reader, hundreds if not more than a thousand pages a day. I remember going to the library with her even weekly so as to help carry one if not two big brown paper shopping bags from Piggly Wiggly filled with books that were, together, heavier than I was in the mid-1960s. It took a long time to check out. She once shoved a small book in my direction to page through while waiting.
I would really struggle to carry those bags down the steps of the library, one bag at a time, two feet for each step. I was very enthusiastic. She was purposely creating good memories for me. She would open up the passenger side door of her white two-door 1961 Pontiac Tempest, putting the seat forward so that I could put the books in the back seat foot wells:
The book she had me read was when I was already a seminarian but which she surely read decades earlier, which she surely shoved at me at the checkout desk, which I surely helped carry home from the library as a tiny little kid was, I am David, a 1963 novel by Anne Holm, which, as W summarizes, “tells the story of a young boy who, with the help of a prison guard, escapes from a concentration camp in an unnamed Eastern European country and journeys to Denmark. Along the way, he meets many people who teach him about life outside the concentration camp.”
That only my second name was David, not my first, was one of mom’s greatest disappointments. She wanted me called DAVID as a first name. As she later told me, there had been fights over this. Dad won. I’m George David, but still…
I have some “friends” who were never as clever as they think they’ve always been with me. They are acutely aware of my background. They’ve always made brutal comments against all Jews and very often as connected somehow to the Star of David. From the beginning, I’ve played this conversation, getting them to admit clearly, finally, what I suspected from the beginning, that they, besides being priests, are full-on neo-Nazis. I’ve had to hear really a lot of entirely prejudicial hatred cast upon all Jews as the years ticked by. Don’t bother trying to guess who they are. I’ve been in something like 26 countries and I have priest friends of very many years all over the world.
As they claimed that the Star of David was an invention of just a handful of centuries ago, I would counter with my archeological experiences at the then newly unearthed parts of the Capernaum synagogue built during Jesus’ teenage and twenty-something years, but previous to Jesus Himself preaching in it. The dominant design engraved into the stonework back in Jesus’ day is the Star of David.
The Star is six pointed. The number six refers to imperfection, as it is the number just previous to seven, which is the representation of perfection, of fulfillment. The six-pointed star looks forward in great hope to the arrival of perfection, of fulfillment with a seventh point, namely, the promised Son of David being born, the promised Messiah visiting His people, Immanuel, God-with-us. That seventh point is the center bit you see below, an actual Star of David Fulfillment, Perfection Incarnate, carved into the Capernaum synagogue:
You know:
The reality of this archeology was, of course, rejected out of hand by my priest friends, because… because… because… (no reason).
As time went on and the topic of the Star of David would again come up, and I would mention the horror of the Holocaust inflicted upon the Jews, and that a yellow star would be pasted on their prison uniforms, I was told that the Star of David itself was their crime.
Thinking I was going for the jugular, I said that even little kids who knew nothing about any Star were themselves thrown into ovens or shot or otherwise exterminated.
The response about those infants being exterminated from one of my neo-Nazi priest friends was, instantaneously: “Because of that Star, they deserve everything they got.” That’s in reference to the kids.
That was on a phone call. You might as well have stabbed me in my larynx. Silence was my response. After some seconds of deafening silence, I ever so quietly pressed the end-call-button. That was it, until today, with the years ticking by. It is the screaming silence of the-not-so-dead-as-you-think and, methinks, the silence of that walking dead Man, Jesus, as He stood before Pontius Pilate. How can you answer something like that? Am I wrong to maintain silence after so very long? Does my silence mean that I’m dead? I think silence speaks loudly. The Jews murdered in extermination camps are not dead eternally. Not at all. And they speak, fully alive, awaiting the judgment of those who murdered them, a judgment to be wrought by Him who will judge the living and dead and the world by fire.
But what to do? I know exactly what to do. I’m giving a Star of David, many Stars of David, elegant, beautiful, bold, pure, simple, lively Stars of David to Jesus’ good mom, the Jewish Immaculate Conception, who added the fulfillment of Perfection Incarnate, the promised Messiah, Immanuel, God with us. Thank you, Mary. Thank you so very much.
And thanks to my mom for wanting to call me David, that is, “The Beloved.”
We beg little Jesus, the Son of David, to forgive us for perhaps being waaaay too presumptuous in giving flowers to His good mom. But maybe He will pass on a Dent-de-Lion from any and all of us.
After all, He’s the Lion of the Tribe of Judah.
Moreover, as Jewish Paul has it in his letter to the Romans 9:4-5…
“The people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory and the covenants; theirs the giving of the law, the temple worship, and the promises. Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them proceeds the human descent of Christ, who is God over all, forever worthy of praise! Amen.”
This will, of course, be a primary target for terrorist destruction. I’m hoping that those capable will protect this site so that it doesn’t become the next September 11. It is a kind of bait attracting terrorists. But that can be an advantage in neutralizing terrorists. The effect I’m looking for would be something like this:
As we anticipate another Pelosian Summer of Love, I think it’s imperative to know something about the protection of the flag. Remember this account of the battle of 1812 and the flag? This video should be played on loop in the planned museums of this flag park:
Let’s hear our National Anthem, yes, again!
“But the words are racist! The words are racist! The words are about hirelings and slaves!”
No. They’re not.
Let’s do some analysis. Firstly, here are the worlds:
O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming, Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight, O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air, Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there; O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
On the shore dimly seen through the mists of the deep, Where the foe’s haughty host in dread silence reposes, What is that which the breeze, o’er the towering steep, As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses? Now it catches the gleam of the morning’s first beam, In full glory reflected now shines in the stream: ‘Tis the star-spangled banner, O long may it wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion, A home and a country, should leave us no more? Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps’ pollution. No refuge could save the hireling and slave From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave: And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave, O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
O thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand Between their loved homes and the war’s desolation. Blest with vict’ry and peace, may the Heav’n rescued land Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation! Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto: ‘In God is our trust.’ And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Now, the analysis:
The lyrics were written in 1814 by Francis Scott Key about the Battle of Baltimore fought against the Brits’ Royal Navy in 1812. The Brits just wouldn’t let it go, and had to engage again, and so lost again, almost thirty years after the end of the Revolutionary War. The Royal Navy would enlist mercenaries, the “hirelings” mentioned in the third verse, and enslave Prisoners of War to fight for them as well, the “slaves” mentioned in the third verse.
Why do I insist on this having nothing whatsoever even remotely to do with black African slaves when Key himself was a slave owner who lived long before the American Civil War? Because of the purpose of the song and what it is describing, that is, a particular night of battle in the harbor of Baltimore against the Royal Navy in which hirelings and slaves were employed in the battle by the Royal Navy, surely other Brits or POW American military.
Even if a tiny percentage of these hirelings and slaves happened to be black Africans, possibly most recently from the United States, the mentions of those hirelings and slaves wouldn’t refer to any previous status of slavery, but only to the slavery imposed by the Royal Navy on any POWs. To win this battle in Baltimore, there would be no interest in going to, say, Mississippi, and killing hirelings and slaves. To hold that to be the meaning of the words is simply ridiculous.
///////// BTW: When I first put up these last three paragraphs in a post some years ago, when this blog wasn’t shadow-banned, when this blog didn’t have posts and graphics removed by third parties of some kind, the analysis on the words of the Star Bangled Banner was visited by basically every State and County government, every school district, every community college, every especially ivy league university, every intel agency, military or otherwise federal. Finally, the narrative changed from the ‘racism’ to mere belligerence in favor of sort of ‘change.’ Well, I’ll tell you what won’t change, the graves of those who gave their lives for the freedom we enjoy today (at least for the next while).
These pictures were taken just the other day. There are a good half-dozen to be seen all at once at this location. Here’s two together:
These are Oriental Tree Squirrels from Thailand, the majority squirrel in and around Brevard, NC. Legend has it that they came to this area by way of escape from a carnival truck waaay back in the day. They’ve spread out in perhaps a fifty mile radius.
And no, they were not bred to be this way on behalf of white supremacist democrats who dress up in blackface and who chum around with members of the KKK and put abortuaries in black neighborhoods so as to commit genocide-by-attrition of the black population. These squirrels are just a breed of squirrel.
But the wokistas will want their 2nd amendment rights to gun down innocent white squirrels so that they can congratulate themselves for “having done something.”
Do I mock the wokistas? Yes. Because more than anyone, they are racist and pretend to be triggered so as to have an excuse to smack down, say, Supreme Court Justices as “racist” for the attempt of those justices to save the lives of black babies in the womb. There is no one more racist than a wokista.
So, how is it that I wrote a post like this? Because real racism like that of the wokistas does bother me. Why’s that? Because God is OUR creator and Jesus came into this world to redeem the lot of us. Not all are saved, but that’s their choice. Bottom line: all lives matter. The wokistas have it that no lives matter. I disagree. And that’s not just a religious “opinion.” Respect for life is natural law written on our hearts by the Most High.
The leak of the mere draft of an opinion of Justice Samuel Alito is, of course, purposed to endanger the lives of the five Justices who sided with that draft at whatever time it was put forward as a draft. Whatever about the lives of the individual Justices, this leak is an attempt to assassinate the viability of the Court. It leads to violent protests which only took seconds to take place with professionally printed signs. All pre-organized. This is subversion, treason. Is it one of the other four Justices on the other side who did this, or ordered this to be done? The full force of the law should be put into effect. If any Justice is killed, hurt or suffers terroristic threats, whatever Justice who did this or ordered this MUST be (1) impeached and (2) imprisoned.
Instead, the Dems, all seemingly pre-organized, immediately scream for politically expanding the Court and/or executing the filibuster, calling the leak a “report”, all of them. Can Nancy and Joe still receive Holy Communion as they maniacally continue to push for the murder of tens and hundreds of millions of innocent and defenseless unborn human beings? Yes, screams the Cardinal Archbishop of Washington, D.C., Wilton Gregory: “Kill ’em all! Murder all the babies! Let’s all go straight to hell with the pro-abort politicians! Yay!”
But let’s bring up the race card, shall we?
It is black women who are with-child who are targeted by Planned Parenthood. It is a genocide of African-Americans by way of abortion that literally the party of the KKK, the Dems, have always pushed: “Kill ’em all!” scream the Dems!”
But wait… what? Black Dem politicians have pushed for genocide of black babies? Yes.
The liberal mass media and the Dems pushing for abortion, black and white, but mostly rich, elite white Dems, like 99%, what to wipe all black people from the face of the earth. And the few black news anchors or squadrons of black politicians hotly lusting for abortion… just… wow…
Do you know who wants to save the lives of black people, those defenseless black babies? It’s mostly poor white Catholics. Yep. Poor white Catholics are called “white supremacists.” No. That would be the KKK, and they are wanting all blacks, Jews and Catholics dead, do they not? Catholics are for life. But what about Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry et alii, you ask? They have removed themselves from all that good and holy, all that is Catholic. Catholics are pro-life, absolutely, from natural conception to natural death. We don’t want to abort the least of the brethren of Jesus, who was Himself so tiny in the womb of Mary for nine months:
But I’m sure I’m now at the top of the list to be raided by the new SWAT teams of the new Czar for Disinformation of the Dems. Whatever. I’m happy to die in witness of little Jesus.
An excellent breakdown of the draft. Thanks Ben Shapiro:
ARISE! LET US BE GOING! 